Taiyo Yamanaka vs Ajeet Rai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance has shown Taiyo Yamanaka with a slight edge, winning 44.76% of points compared to 44.18% by Ajeet Rai. Does this suggest Taiyo has an advantage? Possibly, as second serve performance can significantly impact match outcomes.
• Looking at return game stats, Ajeet Rai surpasses Taiyo Yamanaka, capturing 45.81% of opponent's second serve points versus Taiyo's 44.75%. Could this give Ajeet the upper hand in breaking service games?
• First serve return performance is slightly better for Ajeet Rai at 25.10%, compared to Taiyo’s 24.50%, indicating Ajeet’s potential to pressure Taiyo’s first serves.
• Under pressure, Ajeet Rai excels, saving 61.14% of breakpoints while Taiyo manages only 47.26%. Is Ajeet more adept in crucial moments? This stat leans that way.
• Over the past year, Taiyo maintains a better overall match win percentage at 59.02% compared to Ajeet’s 55.36%, suggesting a slight edge in overall recent form.
• Surface preferences highlight Taiyo’s strength on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Ajeet’s preferred surface is clay with an equivalent 67% success rate. Will surface preference affect this match? Only if the match is on their respective preferred surface.
• Both players typically compete at the ITF $10K level, with Ajeet holding a slightly better win rate of 63.64% over Taiyo’s 60.00%. Does tournament level influence Ajeet's consistency? It appears so.
• When considering opponent quality, Taiyo Yamanaka faces tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 313.44 compared to Ajeet Rai’s 413.46. Does this experience against stiffer opponents make Taiyo more prepared?
• In deciding sets, Ajeet Rai has the upper hand, winning 56% compared to Taiyo’s 38%. Will this deciding set toughness be a factor if the match is closely contested?

Editorial Prediction (November 22, 2025, UTC):

Both Taiyo Yamanaka and Ajeet Rai present unique strengths and competitive statistics, making this an intriguing matchup. Taiyo’s strong second serve performance and higher overall win percentage suggest reliability.

Conversely, Ajeet Rai showcases stronger return game statistics and a remarkable ability to perform under pressure, especially in deciding sets. This resilience can be crucial in close matches.

With Taiyo facing more challenging opponents over the last year, he might be more battle-tested for high-pressure situations. However, Ajeet’s superiority in breakpoint saving and deciding set performance provides a firm edge.

Considering the overall analysis of both players, Ajeet Rai, with his exceptional under-pressure performance and return game strength, is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.